Fr.
Juan Romero
Today---October 21, 2012---ten
days after the Golden Jubilee of the Second Vatican Council and the opening of
the Year of Faith, Kateri Tekakwitha was
officially canonized a saint. Together
with her, Pope Benedict XVI also declared six others saints. I was privileged
to be among a crushing throng of thousands in front of St. Peter’s Basilica.
Saint Kateri, “Lily of the
Mohawks,” was born of an Algonquin mother and Mohawk chief in what is today
upstate New York near the Canadian border.
She is the first native American to be canonized. Both of her parents died by the time she was
four, and Kateri died from smallpox in 1680 at the young age of 24.
I learned today from an
eastcoaster that her name is properly pronouced KATeri. His companion commented it was a case of potaaato/potahto. From a NY Times article, I also learned that
Tekakwitha was a nick-name given her after she became partially blind from
smallpox. It means “She who bumps into
things.”
It is not a stretch to connect
St. Kateri to New Mexico. My affection
for her is related to my roots there, and my love for the Taos Pueblo and its
people. Corina Santistevan, New Mexican
historian and preservationist, as well as one of my special mentors, has
greatly promoted devotion to Kateri in the north (of NM) where love for the new
saint has increased in recent years.
Kateri’s canonization comes toward the end of this year that began on
January 6 with the centennial celebration of New Mexico as a State of the Union. It had been a Territory of the United States
since its military occupation in 1846.
It seems super-ironic to me
that St. Kateri Tekakwitha died in 1680, the same year in which took place the
only successful rebellion of Native Americans against Europeans, Spanish
settlers. Popé, a talented shaman, linguist and warrior from Ohkay Owingeh
Pueblo, coordinated the uprising beginning in Taos. Spanish colonists in 1598 had
named the Pueblo San Juan, and Popé is clearly to be distinguished from “the
pope.” The settlers were driven south
toward the El Paso area and beyond, but returned thirteen years later, somewhat
chastened and having learned to live in peace with the original
inhabitants. May Kateri intercede today for
all peoples to live toether in peace in spite of cultural and religious
differences.
I see Kaeri as a “suffering
servant type,” and a figure of reconciliation.
She died of a disease unknown to Indians before the coming of the White
man, and in that sense---although herself innocent---took our burdens upon
herself.
I also see her as a liminal
person, one of the saints of the American continent who unites people across
borders. Her mother introduced her to
her Catholic faith. Faithful to it, she studied it as a young woman and was
baptized at eighteen. Ridicued for her
fatih, she moved to Canada where Catholics claim her as their own, as well as
people of the entire American continent including the United States, Central
and South America. After more than five
centuries of evangelization in the new world of America, and four centuries
after her death, she is the first “Native American” to finally be canonized.
Today I salute the people of
the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians with whom I have been privileged to
work. The Parish of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Palm Springs this last December celbrated
the centennial Cahuilla Indians donated land to the Catholic Church through the
Bishop of San Diego.
As we begin this Year of
Faith, fifty years after the Second Vatican Council was inaugurated, may Saint
Kateri Tekakwitha help us to grow in our Catholic faith and to be conscious
agents of the “new evangelization.”
[Letter to
an artistic Taoseña, close relative of Padre Martinez –
written 2004, revised 2012.]
by
Fr. Juan Romero
Dear Maya:
You
ask my opinion on clerical celibacy. Yes, I think it should become
optional for any diocesan priest. In my view, this would greatly enhance
the freedom with which a priest to whom God has given the charism of celibacy
will live it. Within a few sentences discussing marriage, adultery,
divorce, and virginity or celibacy, Jesus’ disciples suggested, “it is better
not to marry.” He answered, “Not all can accept [this] word, but only those to
whom that is granted…. Some [are incapable of marriage] because they…have
renounced marriage for the sake of the kingdom of heaven….Whoever can
accept this ought to accept it."[1]
St.
Paul gave his own witness in favor of celibacy for practical motives as well as
for theological reasons. He was single-hearted, and counseled
celibacy to other disciples and evangelizers to be fully concerned for the
service of the people to whom they are sent instead of being wrapped up in the
cares of wife and family.[2] In
Paul's teaching, celibacy is a charism, a special gift given by God for
building up the Body of Christ, the Church. It is a gift freely given,
and awaits a free response. Both the gift and response have to be free if
God is to be pleased. If a response to a gift is somehow forced,
then there is no real freedom in the response. Freedom has to be from
within the mind and heart. If celibacy is a charism, a gift God
gives to a particular person for the good of the whole Church, let us hope that
such a person freely accepts the gift.
However,
a person must also be free not to accept a particular gift from God
without in any way fearing s/he might be punished for not accepting a gift
offered. Furthermore, no one should try to pretend s/he has a gift
from God if in fact s/he does not. The pretense is worse if the
person then tries to live as if s/he has a gift of “wisdom, knowledge, healing,
mighty deed, prophecy, discernment of spirits, gift of tongues, interpretation
of tongues,”[3]…or
celibacy. For example, being an artist is a gift of God; it is a talent
that comes from Him. For sure, one has to work at it in order to better
develop it. While only some may have the gift of celibacy, there are
others who definitely do not. Any gift God gives is for His greater glory
and the service of people. Of course, a gift—talent
or charism—given by God may also be used for self-fulfillment and as a way
to make a living, but only secondarily.
The
Pauline text on Marriage and Virginity[4] merits
prayerful reflection by anyone interested in understanding or
appreciating celibacy. The footnotes in a bible[5] are
worth studying and contemplating. Here are some texts from Chapter 7 of
St. Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians that I particularly recommend for
reflection:
• "Indeed,
I wish everyone to be as I am, but each has a particular gift from God, one of
one kind and one of another."[6]
• "...Everyone
should live as the Lord has assigned, just as God called each one."[7]
• "Now
in regard to virgins I have no commandment from the Lord, but I give my
opinion...that it is a good thing for a person to remain as he is,”[8]
i.e. either married or single.
• "I
should like you to be free of anxieties. An unmarried man is anxious
about the things of the Lord, how he may please the Lord. But a married
man is anxious about the things of the world, how he may please his wife, and
he is divided...."[9]
• "So
then, the one who marries his virgin does well; the one who does not marry her
will do better."[10]
Clerical
celibacy matters because of the example of Jesus, the exhortation of St. Paul,
and the practice of several centuries in the Western (Latin Rite) Church.[11] However,
for a Catholic clergyman to be required to be celibate is not a dogma of the
Church, and therefore theoretically could be changed.[12] The
apostles were all married, except for St. John. We hear about how Jesus cured
Peter’s mother-in-law when he lived with them.[13] For
the first ten centuries of the Church, the great majority of clergy were
married. At the same time, there has always been the witness of monks and
later religious order priests such as Franciscans, Dominicans, etc. who are
religious by definition because they take the three vows of
poverty, chastity, and obedience. Celibacy is an evangelical
counsel, not a divine mandate. Although clerical celibacy is not
essential to priesthood, it is a serious discipline. For Catholic
clergy in the Western Church, celibacy is a matter of church law as well as an
evangelical counsel. The bishop may punish celibacy’s flagrant violation
with the ecclesiastical censure of suspension from officiating at the sacred
duties of presiding at Mass and administering
sacraments.
In my
opinion, if the rule mandating celibacy were to be changed, that would
strengthen the freedom of celibacy as a charism by which one freely
responds to God's call. It is a vocation that can be lived with
authenticity only if it is freely chosen in response to God’s initiative.
It is obviously not for everyone, nor is it even necessarily a “better
way,” but only different. It is, however, very definitely a call to
some. Part of its importance within the Catholic community is that it
bears witness to the future—the fullness of the coming of the kingdom—when
giving in marriage will no longer be.
The
life of celibacy is essential to the chosen life of a vowed religious priest,
brother, or sister. Taking the vow of celibacy, together with the vows of
poverty and obedience, is what makes a Franciscan, Dominican, Jesuit or member
of any religious order fall into the category of a religious. A diocesan
priest---sometimes called a secular priest[14] because
he lives “in the world, but is not of it”--- is not
irreligious. However, he is not a religious in the manner of one who
takes vows to keep the evangelical counsels. This is one of the main
distinctions between a diocesan/secular priest and a religious order priest or
sister. Nevertheless, the diocesan/secular priest promises to live
in the spirit of the evangelical counsels as they apply to his state of life,
but is not bound to them by the virtue of religion.
Another
important difference between a diocesan/secular priest and a religious is that
a religious priest is immediately subject to the authority of his religious
superior, sometimes called a provincial. On the other hand, a
diocesan priest is immediately subject to the authority of the local bishop of
his diocese. A diocesan/secular priest belongs to a diocese, the local
church. The priest is "incardinated into” or hooked onto a
particular diocese, like a hinge on a door. The diocese is the “door,” and the
“hinge” is the promise of reverence and obedience to the particular bishop
of that diocese, together with the promise to serve the people of that local
church. The real authority for any priest has to be Jesus Christ, but his
immediate earthly authority is either the superior for a religious priest, or
the local bishop for a secular/diocesan priest. In the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries--when there were only Franciscans in New Mexico--the
Franciscan Custos (Guardian) was the main person directly in
charge of priest-personnel.
Since
the ninth century, celibacy became a rule for all priests of the Latin Rite in
the Western Church. One of the primary goals of the rule, as
Father Cozzen explains,[15] was
to insure that church property would not be passed onto the children of a
priest. Priests that you are familiar with are of the Latin Rite.
Most western Catholics are not well informed about the Eastern Rites of our
one, holy, Catholic (universal), and apostolic church. Eastern Rite Catholics believe
all the same doctrines (dogmas) that we do; they have the same sacraments
(Eucharist is central for them as well); they honor Blessed Mary with great
devotion, maybe even more than we do; and they are in union with the Holy
Father in Rome.
Both
the Eastern Rite Catholic Church in union with Rome, as well as the Greek
Orthodox Church separated from Rome, maintain their custom of a married
clergy. However, in the early twentieth century, the Latin Church
imposed its discipline of celibacy upon Eastern Rite clergy residing and
ministering in the United States. Eastern Rite Catholics are not to be
confused with members of the Eastern Orthodox Church who also
adhere to the same dogmas, have the same sacraments, and honor
Mary. However, they do not acknowledge the authority of the pope in
the same way we do. Their members are our closest brothers and
sisters within the family of Christians. Although the will of God
and prayer of Jesus is that we “all be one,”[16] we
have sadly and scandalously been estranged since Great Western Schism of
1054. We Roman Catholics believe that our Holy Father in Rome is the
successor of St. Peter whom Jesus chose—together with all of Peter’s
successors—to be the visible head of the Church on earth. “And so I say
to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church…”[17] The Greek
Orthodox Church may have great respect for the Bishop of Rome as the Patriarch
of the West, but it does not see him in the same way as Catholics.
In
my opinion, a change in the rule of celibacy making it optional for priests of
the Latin Rite to marry or not would enhance the practice of celibacy. God
freely gives the gift (charism) to whomever He wills. Some diocesan
priests who have received and accepted the charism of celibacy happily and
faithfully live out that life. Other diocesan priests who perhaps feel
called both to priesthood and to marriage would be able to integrate both
vocations into their lives. Monks and religious order priests, however,
would always live their charism of the celibate life that is intrinsic to the
nature of their vocation, fidelity to the evangelical councils that includes
celibacy.
A
change in policy would allow diocesan priests to either marry or to remain
single. Many priests perhaps may choose to marry if given the
option. However, those who choose to remain single “for the sake of
the kingdom of heaven”[18] would
do so because God has called them to live a celibate life and has given them
the graces to do so. With His actual graces, the Lord helps a priest
or religious woman live their celibate vocation fully and freely. These
graces enable a person to act with an enlightened mind to better discern God’s
holy will, and an energized heart to fully, faithfully, and freely follow God’s
will. The Lord gives these special helps (graces) to the persons He wills to
bless with the gift (charism) of celibacy. However, each person so
gifted has to freely accept the gift, and to ask the Lord for His help to
remain faithful in living it out.
It
may be surprise you to know that even at the present time in the Western
Rite—in both Europe and here in the United States-- there are Catholic priests
in good standing who are also married! This is the case of some Lutheran
and Anglican men who were married clergymen and later became Catholics.
Keeping their wives, they were ultimately ordained as Catholic priests.
I
predict there will someday be a change in the discipline of celibacy that would
allow some so-called “permanent” deacons who are married to eventually also
become ordained as priests while retaining their wives. Deacons are
already part of the hierarchy-- the “holy orders” of deaconate, priesthood, and
episcopacy. Such deacons ready and willing to respond to the call to
priesthood will have already shown well-developed qualities of stability and
spiritual maturity. Their stability is reflected in solid marriages, and
their spiritual maturity echoed by consistent and effective service as deacons serving
the community over a period of years, perhaps seven. Such a deacon would
likely be required to spend a year or two in formative preparation for
ordination to priesthood. If there is to be a change in the
discipline of celibacy for clergy of the Western Rite, the Holy Spirit will
show the way, and it will happen in God’s good time, God’s right
time.
I
briefly review for you some history of your antepasado: Antonio
José Martínez, born of the Martín Serrano clan in 1793 at the Plaza of
Santa Rosa in Abiquiú, validly married a distant relative when he was a
young man of 19. He fathered a daughter in the town of his birth,
but the following year, his wife died in childbirth. Two years
later, leaving his daughter with her maternal grandparents, Antonio José traveled
to Durango to enter the seminary and study for the priesthood. At
the time, all of New Mexico and surrounding regions belonged to the diocese of
Durango that was part of the Kingdom of Spain. The year before he was ordained
in 1822, the Republic of Mexico had become independent from Spain, and Taos
became the northern frontier of the new Republic. After six years of
study, he was ordained a priest at the age of 29.
Sickly,
he returned to Taos before formally finishing his studies, and lived with his
parents while recuperating from his breathing ailment. Meanwhile, Padre
Martinez helped the elderly Franciscan pastor of San Geronimo parish whose seat
was at the Taos Pueblo. The parish included Our Lady of Guadalupe
Church at the Taos Plaza, a mission of the Pueblo Church, and the church of his
boyhood. He got better, and was assigned as the priest in charge of
Tomé south of Albuquerque, and then another stint at
Santo Tomás Church in Abiquiú where he had been baptized,
married, and where his wife lay buried. During this time, he had the
opportunity to re-connect with his daughter who was living with her
grandparents, his in-laws and parents of his deceased wife. Alas,
within a year, his daughter María de La Luz also died at the young
age of twelve in the year 1825. By 1826,
Padre Martínez was assigned to become the priest in charge of San
Geronimo parish that included his beloved church of Our Lady of Guadalupe in
Taos. He was to have an eventful career for the next forty-two years
not only as a priest, but also as an educator, journalist-printer-publisher,
rancher, lawyer and politician. His concern for the poor wherever he
was became a hallmark of his ministry.
In
1851, Santa Fe and its environs (including Taos) became part of a new diocese
within the United States. However, after a few years, he began to
have conflicts with his bishop, and the last years of his life were clouded in
controversy with his new bishop. However, his peers in the
Territorial Legislature continued to hold him in high regard, and upon his
death in 1867 carved this encomium upon his tombstone: “La Honra de
Su País/The Honor of His Homeland.”
Padre
Martinez was an intellectual and practical leader who did wonderful things for
the benefit of the people of New Mexico and beyond. His
accomplishments were great, and so were some of his faults including pride and
obstinacy. Bishop Jean B. Lamy suspended him in 1856, and
excommunicated him in 1858 for his “scandalous writings” against the bishop’s policy
re-introducing tithing. Even as a young priest, as far back as 1829,
Padre Martinez had resisted that policy enshrined in the civil law of the
Republic of Mexico because it was an excessive burden on the
poor. He later, during the mid 1830s, used his legislative skills to
change civil law to make tithing illegal.
Neither
Bishop Lamy nor his Vicar General Joseph Machebeuf ever
alleged immoral behavior on the part of Padre Martinez, but the fact is that he
did have children while serving as the priest of Taos. He definitely
had a vocation to the intellectual life, and service for the benefit of the
people, especially the poor. He may have had a vocation to the
priesthood, but he certainly did not have the charism of celibacy.
Your tío Vicente
has written clearly about the progeny of Padre Martínez, and is publishing
the results of his extensive research. I commend to you his work
soon to be published in a genealogical journal, but wish to highlight a few
items I deem especially significant:
• In his
Last Will and Testament, modified and ratified a month before he died in 1867,
Padre Martínez mentions briefly—almost curtly—his only legitimate
daughter María de La Luz who was named after his young wife that died
in childbirth. He was to have two other daughters given the same
name, the first also died as an infant. Padre Martínez had
a predilection for the name, and a great devotion to Blessed Mary
under the title La Purísima Concepción de María. He
kept and revered a favorite image still extant among the heirlooms of
the family; his private oratorio and graveside (campo santo)
were dedicated to La Purísima.
• His
first son was born in July 1830 around the feast of Santiago (July
25). There have been questions about the identity of the mother,
whether or not Padre Martinez was actually the father, and from whom did
Santiago get his last name of Valdez. It seems clear that Padre
Martinez was indeed the father of Santiago Valdez, and a certain Theodora
Marquez was his mother. Your uncle Vicente Martínez deftly
and thoroughly provides answers to most questions raised, and I emphasize a few
items. Padre Martinez had a special love
for Santiago—educated him well in his own schools (elementary school, seminary
and law school), brought him up as part of his own family (the Padre refers to
him in his Will as “mi familiar”), named him administrator of his Last
will and Testament. He also asked Santiago
and Vicente Ferrer, the next to youngest son and future Presbyterian
evangelizer, to be care-takers of his private chapel. The Padre bequeathed to Santiago and to his
descendants the use of the Padre’s own family name of Martinez, i.e., children
of Martín. Finally, Padre Martinez left his precious books and
documents to Santiago Valdez. In 1877, a decade after the Padre’s death,
Santiago would stitch together the Biografía del Presbêtero Antonio
José Martínez, Cura de Taos today found in
the Ritch Collection of the Huntington Library near Los Angeles. A fully annotated scholarly version English
is scheduled for publication in the near future.
•
Padre Martinez had other children with Teodora Romero
Trujillo. At 16, she married a Mr. Oliver, and gave birth to a
daughter in 1826. Within a short time and maybe at the same
time---perhaps in an accident—both father and daughter died. This
was the same year that Padre Martínez returned to Taos as the new
priest in town. The young widow Theodora lived with her parents
next door to the Padre’s house, and she eventually became the priest’s
housekeeper. Human circumstances led both first to mutual friendship, and
eventually—within four years--blossomed into a more intimate and long-term
relationship. Their respective fathers had known each other and
worked together in Taos since the early nineteenth century. It is
quite possible that Severino Martínez and José Romero--the respective fathers
of Padre Martinez and Teodora Romero--were business partners. Their
names are associated with the land and building of Guadalupe Church in Taos
since 1804. Furthermore, Severino obtained
some nearby land that in 1825 he gave for the building of a residence to his
son the new parish priest in town.
Moreover, both Padre Martínez and Theodora had been widowed at
a young age, and each also had lost a daughter. The priest and his young
housekeeper had a son, and over the following fourteen years, the couple would
have a number of children. As a loving and dutiful father, Padre
Martinez in his Last Will and Testament explicitly and adequately provided for
each of them.
Padre Martínez named
his next son, born of Theodora in 1831, George---not Jorge. By
family lore, it is thought that this name in English was given to honor George
Washington for whom Padre Martinez had great appreciation. The
maternal grandparents were José Romero and María Trujillo.
• Next
to the last son was Vicente Ferrer Romero, born in
1844. He is a significant figure in New Mexican history insofar as
he carried on the religious and publication legacy of his father, the
priest. However, he did so as a Presbyterian evangelist and
publisher of Protestant tracts. When in his formative
teenage years, thirteen and fourteen, the controversy between
Bishop Lamy and Padre Martinez was cresting and exploded into
suspension and finally excommunication by 1858. By the time Vicente
Ferrer Romero was a mature man entering his thirties, he came into contact with
the Presbyterian minister Rev. Roberts, and in 1873 invited him to Taos where
Vicente helped him establish a school. Vicente Ferrer Romero became
an effective circuit rider appealing to many disaffected Catholics who were smarting
and devastated the denunciation of their beloved Cura de Taos.
A
band of Jesuit priests gave missions in Taos after Padre Martinez died in
1867. As a result, many families and
individuals who had been disaffected returned to the Catholic Church, but
certainly not all. What is true is that both Catholics and
Presbyterians over the years have become more united in their appreciation of
Padre Martinez, Cura de Taos, and appreciative of his
legacy. At the unveiling of the bronze life-sized memorial of Padre
Martinez placed at the center of the Taos Plaza in July
2006, Edmundo Vasquez—a relative of the Padre and committed
Presbyterian layman—prayed the main prayer of dedication for the event.
Padre
Martinez died reconciled to his Church through the sacraments of Penance,
Anointing and Holy Communion administered by Padre Lucero of Arroyo Hondo---his
former student, friend and neighbor. In my own prayers, I often
commend Padre Martínez to the Lord, and I invite you to do the same. He
succeeded in doing a lot of good, and followed his conscience. May
we do the same.
God bless him and all of us!
Padre Juan
Father
Juan Romero
[1] Mt. 19: 10-12, New American Bible.
[2] I Cor. 7.
[3] Cf. I Cor. 12-14 for St. Paul’s theology and practical exhortations about charisms for the good of the community.
[4] I Cor. 7.
[5] Such as the New American Bible published by Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
[6] I Cor. 7:7.
[7] I Cor. 7:17.
[8] I Cor. 7:26.
[9] I Cor. 7: 33-34.
[10] I Cor. 7: 38.
[11] The discipline of clerical celibacy has been the rule for Catholic clergy of the Roman Rite since the Second Lateran Council in the tenth century.
[12] For a history of Celibacy in the Church, and an opinion of its possible future direction, Cf. Donald Cozzens, Freeing Celibacy, © 2006: http://www.amazon.com/.
[13] Mt 8:14.
[14] From the Latin saeculum that means world.
[15] Cozzens, op. cit., passim.
[16] Jn 17:21.
[17] Mt. 16: 18.
[18] Mt. 19:12
[Prepared for CEHILA-USA
and given at Miami, Florida 5-30-2008]
by
Juan
Romero
In 1943, my family
came to Los Angeles from Taos and Albuquerque, NM. Dad landed a wartime job as an accountant for Lockheed
Aircraft in Burbank. The journey
and our settlement was part of a long tradition of the New Mexican colonization
of southern California whose culmination had taken place almost a century
before. Antecedents of a pattern of migration to California—through Baja
California-- go back before the founding of the United States.[i] Between 1830 and 1842, over 150
families from New Mexico came and settled in southern California, making up the
largest population center between Santa Fe and Los Angeles. Although the
territory historically had a variety of names, the area was best known as Agua
Mansa or San Salvador, clustering around today’s town of Colton on the border
between San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. The inhabitants of these various
small villages came to California from New Mexico through Abiquiu northwest of
Santa Fe and southwest of Taos, and the majority settled in the area’s
neighborhoods within a four-year span from 1838 to 1842. Of course, some of the New Mexican
immigrants settled in the much larger town of Los Angeles, and others traveled
into northern California and other environs.
The leader or
trailmaster of this trek from New Mexico to California in the fall of 1841 was
Lorenzo Trujillo. His partners
leading the group were fellow Abiqueños and mule-wrangler Hipolitano Espinosa,
and Comandante José Antonio Martinez de La Rosa (de La Puente) was guide. Comandante Martinez was a single man,
and would not become a settler as Trujillo and Espinosa were doing. It was the Comandante, however,
who about four days after their
arrival in California, would on November 9, 1842 make the contact with Mexican
immigration authorities in Los Angeles to advise them the group from New Mexico
had arrived.
Five early
settlers from Abiquiu in Southern California had various degrees of kinship
with Padre Antonio José Martinez who was also in Abiquiu. Although popularly
known as the Cura de Taos, Padre
Martinez shared the same place of birth and most likely some personal
interaction with these five who enjoyed a strong New Mexico-California
Connection:
·
Julian Chavez
·
Santiago Martinez
·
Comandante José Antonio Martínez
·
Lorenzo Trujillo
·
Encarnación Martínez de Rowland
Julian Chavez came
to Los Angeles in 1830 at the tender age of twenty, and was Vice Mayor of Los
Angeles by the time he was thirty.
Since 1958, his name has been linked with the L.A. Dodgers who at that
time made “Chavez Ravine”[ii]
their home. The other Aquiqueños
were transplanted in and around various small communities surrounding what is today
the town of Colton along the border of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties.
It is liminal space—a miniature borderland--along the Santa Ana River at the
crossroads of the Southern Pacific and Santa Fe Railroads as well as the
intersection of Interstate Highways 10 and 215.
Santiago Martinez,
although he had made other trips to the area probably since 1830, was the first
of the group to settle nearby.
Before reaching their destination, his wife gave birth to their son in
1838, and took up residence by the Santa Ana River that at one time may have
been an Indian inhabitation.[iii]
This northern New Mexico nuclear family thus became the first non-Indian
inhabitants of what was to become known as the Inland Empire.
Both Comandante
José Antonio Martínez and Lorenzo Trujillo were key pioneers of the Agua
Mansa-San Salvador developments.
The parents of
Encarnación Martinez de Rowland were Felipe Martin(ez) and (Ana) María Trujillo
of Ranchos de Taos,[iv] and Santiago Martinez was “believed to
be related to Encarnación. ”[v]
At least since1834, John Rowland or his wife Encarnación or his in-laws was
doing business in California in the trade of New Mexican blankets for
California horses and mules.[vi]
Padre Martinez
wrote a very significant Letter of Transit for John Rowland and family in 1842 when they emigrated from New Mexico
to settle in California. John
Rowland and William Workman—both having New Mexican wives and having become
Catholics and naturalized citizens of the Mexican Republic—were eligible to own
property and were among the first Anglos to become landowners in California.
Although Padre Antonio José Martinez was never an inhabitant of California,
with his Letter of Transit on behalf of John Rowland and his wife Encarnación
Rowland de Martínez—likely a relative of the Padre--he nevertheless helped to
fuel the development and even population explosion of the territory. In this essay, I wish to highlight this
Letter of Transit for its significance in illustrating Padre Martinez’ own
California Connection.
ABIQUIU
Abiquiu today is a
small village or group of villages along NM Hwy 84, southwest of Taos and
northwest of Santa Fe-Santa Cruz (Española)-Chimayó and San Juan Pueblo. Throughout the nineteenth century, this
village of beehive of activity served as a major conduit, if not launching pad,
for travel between Santa Fe and Los Angeles. It was also the birthplace of a remarkable group of people
who greatly influenced the life and growth of California in the two decades
between1830 and 1850. It remains a
spiritual vortex, a mystic space of great beauty that served as the jumping off
point for many trekkers from New Mexico to California.
In Jurassic times,
Abiquiu was near Panama—slowly being separated by the shift of tectonic plates
at the rate of one thumb nail’s width a year. Remnants of prehistoric dinosaurs, common to both Panama and
Abiquiu, were discovered in 1947 nearby Ghost Ranch, a Presbyterian Retreat
Center located on Las Animas land
grant. Over the centuries, Abiquiu
has been a welcoming place for many quite different kinds of people. Indians of every stripe and mixture,
resulting from native peoples’ long history of internecine warfare and
intermarriage, have made it their home.
Many Indian children were captured in warfare among different tribes or
with Spanish settlers. Those
growing up in Spanish homes as servants or slaves—a practice not considered
controversial at the time--were baptized and brought up as Christian and known
as Genízaros. Buffalo soldiers—black men serving in
the Civil War—also have their honored place in Abqiuiu history. New Mexico in
general, but especially Abiquiu, is famous for its Brujas/brujos. The
folk tales about them reflect the transcendent and spiritual nature of the
stark yet supremely beautiful landscape shaded in textures of yellow, brown,
orange, ochre, white and rust. Its
hills and high cliffs inspire spiritual seekers such as Penitentes, monks
(Catholic and Shiite), artists as well as reclusive movie stars. Its high desert lands are peppered with
skeletal remains of cattle, often represented by Georgia O’Keefe.
JULIAN CHAVEZ
Julian Chavez came from Abiquiu to Los
Angeles in 1830 when he was twenty years old—within a year after the first
trade caravans left Santa Fe for Los Angeles. Chavez was a pre-teen when Padre Martinez as a young curate
returned to Abiquiu, the village of his birth, to serve as parish priest at
Santo Tomás, the church of his baptism. Young Julian may have been an altar
server for Padre Martinez in their small community, since he was about the
right age for that.[vii] Julian Chavez was among the sixty men
that Antonio Armijo led in 1830 from Abiquiu into California through northern
Arizona (the Gila River route) and southern Utah. After eighty-six days en
route, Armijo’s party arrived at San Gabriel Mission where they traded New
Mexican blankets for California horses and mules that were already commodities
of major exchange.
Chavez eventually
settled among the gentle hills along the Río de Nuestra Señora Reina de Los
Angeles de Porciúcula, twelve miles west of
the Mission and a very short distance northeast of what is now central city Los
Angeles. Chavez Ravine/Palo Verde
is not very far from the opening to Elysian Park by El Río
Porciúncula (the L.A. River) flowing (most
of the time) under the location where the North Broadway bridge would come to
be located. On a hot day in early
August1769, members of the Gaspár Portolá expedition rested on a nearby hill
overlooking the river. It served
as a cool resting place on their way from newly founded Mission San Diego de
Alcalá to Monterrey, the capital of Alta California at the time.
The day was August
2, a day special to Franciscans for recalling the small chapel in his hometown
of Assisi where St. Francis in the thirteenth century died. In life, he used to like to visit the
place and spend time there in prayer.
Three centuries later, his followers dwarfed the chapel by building a
large basilica around it. The
chapel became known as the “small portion”—la porciúcula.
Franciscans dedicated the chapel and basilica to Our Lady of the Angels,
and celebrate the feast day of that dedication on August 2.
While resting on
the hillside overlooking the river, Fray Juan Crespín , chaplain of the de
Portolá expedition, noted the date and feast day in his diary, and named the
river for the feast day. Some
twelve years later, colonists from Sonora would establish a pueblo twelve miles east of San Gabriel Mission, and name
it for the river’s full name: El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora Reina de
Los Angeles de Porciúcula.
The Elysian Park
hillside on North Broadway where the Portolá expedition rested was an entrance
to the Palo Verde neighborhood that was better known as Chavez Ravine that in 1958 became the new home of the
former Brooklyn Dodgers. It was
named for Julian Chavez, another man from Abiquiu who came to California when
he was young, about twenty years old, and eventually became the equivalent of
Vice Mayor of Los Angeles.
Americans claiming their Lone Star independence from both
Mexico and the United States lost the Alamo to Mexican troops, but won the more
important battle at San Jacinto in 1836.
In an effort to recuperate revenues from military expenditures in Texas,
General Santa Ana decided to levy taxes in New Mexico, and sent Albino Perez to
do the job. José María Chavez
of Abiquiu, Lieutenant in the Mexican Army and
older brother of Julian Chavez, supported Perez in
the failed attempt to impose taxes.
Julian Chavez while in his twenties, traveled a few times between
California and New Mexico. In
1837, he joined his older brother in the tax-collecting effort, and by 1838
definitively moved to California.
Indians and New Mexican settlers of the north—around
Chimayó, NM—rose up against the government of the Republic of Mexico in1837. The rebels beheaded Governor Perez,
installed a Pueblo Indian in the Governors’ Palace at Santa Fe, and then
singled out the Chavez brothers for execution for collaborating with Albino
Perez. Consequently, together with
several relatives, the Chavez brothers left their family home in
Abiquiu--an adobe building diagonally across the road from Santo Tomás Church
that later became residence of Georgia O'Keefe—and made their way out of New Mexico by way of Utah to California. For Julian, it was a return
trip, but this time he stayed tending to his property and political career.[viii] In 1838, when he was thirty years old
and only after eight years in California, Julian Chavez (1810-1879) became the
Interim Mayor of Los Angeles.
Chavez served
three terms as a member of the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors in
1852, 1858, and 1861. His tract of
land in Elysian Park (“Chavez Ravine”) was used as an isolation hospital to
treat smallpox principally among Chinese and Mexicans. Besides becoming Vice Mayor of
Los Angeles, Julian Chavez also served as Councilman specializing in water
rights in 1846 and 1847. The year
he became a member of the first group of LA County Board of Supervisors in June
1852, he hosted a July 4th party at downtown Bella Union Hotel. Afterwards, he invited everyone to walk
with him in mile-long patriotic parade for a picnic at his vineyard off
Riverside Dr. in the northeast part of the city (near today’s Stadium Way on
the 5 Freeway).
In1865, Julian was
elected to the City Council, and soon afterwards, at the age of 55, got married
to Maria Luisa Machado who was less than half his age. Bishop Mora presided at
the wedding that took place at the Plaza Church of Our Lady Queen of
Angels. Chavez served other terms
as councilman in 1870-71, and again in 1873. He also served on the Plaza-Improvement Committee, and
worked closely with William Henry Workman, the son of William Workman who had
come with John Rowland from Taos to California in the early 1840s. Julian Chavez died at his home in
Chavez Ravine on July 25, 1879[ix]--
at the age of 70. It was the feast
of Santiago (St. James), the patron of Hispanic America so revered in New
Mexico, and almost exactly twelve years to the day after the death of his
fellow Abiqueño, Padre Martinez.
SANTIAGO MARTINEZ
The first trade
caravan had left from Taos to Los Angeles in 1829,[x]
and Julian Chavez came the following year. Santiago Martinez may also have come into California as
early as 1830. Santiago was
related to Encarnación Martinez who married John Rowland in 1823. She also had roots in Abiquiú, and was
related to Padre Martinez. In mid-August 1832, Santiago Martinez went “to
California from New Mexico with fifteen men. Hippolito Espinosa (later a settler of Agua Mansa) is with
the party.”[xi] Six years later, at the very beginning
of fall in1838 and a month after the usual caravan headed for California,
Santiago Martinez and his pregnant wife Manuelita Renaga were in a caravan of
seven people that Lorenzo Trujillo had led from Abiquiu. Manuelita “gave birth to a son
(Apolinario) in late November at Resting Springs,[xii]
an oasis in the high desert near the southern end of Death Valley”[xiii]
and just over the California boarder from Nevada. Trjuillo’s small caravan arrived in the San Bernardino
Valley on December 12, 1838-- the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe.
The couple decided
to settle on property near the present-day town of Colton. California rancher Antonio Lugo
exchanged land for the promise of protection against Indians, and Santiago knew
that through Lorenzo Trujillo, he could help recruit Indian fighters from
Abiquiu to protect the Lugo San Bernardino Ranch. The young Santiago Martinez
family lived on a "bluff overlooking the Santa Ana River near today's San
Bernardino Valley College campus."[xiv]
Santiago, his wife and child stayed there, but Lorenzo and the others returned
to Abiquiu with the spring caravan.
They came back to Rancho San Bernardino in the fall caravan of 1840—this
time to settle where Santiago had settled. Hipolitano Espinosa and his family were among the first to
settle there, and the settlement came to be called "Politana"[xv]
in his honor.
The California
rendezvous location at Politana (an early settlement of New Mexicans, named for
Hipólito Espinosa, at a draw near today's San Bernardino Valley College) was an
important place in the trading scheme of things. Hipólito Espinosa returned with his family to Rancho San
Bernardino in the fall of 1840 and settled near Martínez' place, thus beginning
the New Mexican colonization in earnest.
He worked as the chief horse wrangler for the Rancho San Bernardino, the
location of his home at the settlement of Politana, and was active in the
annual rendezvous near Colton where New Mexican blankets and goods were
exchanged for California horses and mules. The business had become so brisk that it exceeded 4,000
animals for the 1842 spring caravan from Los Angeles over the Spanish Trail to
the junction of the Santa Fe and Chihuahua Trails in the Abiquiu-Taos-Santa Fe
caravan complex.[xvi]
After a relatively
brief time living in Politana, there was a territorial dispute between
California landowners Lugo and Bandini.
As a result, New Mexican settlers moved nine miles south to the Bandini
Donation where a large settlement of their fellow Abiqueños were living by now.[xvii]
John Rowland,
having come from Taos to La Puente, had returned to Taos to retrieve his wife
and family in order to definitively move with him to their new California home.
“In the fall of 1842, the Rowlands [John, now with wife and family] returned
from Taos to California along with Lorenzo Trujillo and Hipolito Espinosa in a
trading caravan under the command of Santiago Martinez who is believed to be
related to Encarnación.”[xviii]
It seems that Santiago was a business agent in California trading for
Encarnación, and when she joined her husband John Rowland in moving to
California, Santiago Martinez helped them move to California. Encarnación later hired Santiago to
work as foreman on their ranch where they settled in east La Puente, today’s
Walnut-Rowland Heights—near Vejar School. Santiago moved from Politana, near the juncture of
present day San Bernardino-Colton, and moved about sixty miles westward from
Agua Mansa to east La Puente, near the location of the first Walnut (Spada)
City Hall and Vejar School, Valley Blvd. and Lemon. Their “Martinez Adobe” in
La Puente-Walnut, not far from the Roland Heights residence of Encarnación and
John Rowland, was shown on older maps until 1970s. Santiago Martinez and family lived in the adobe for about
eight years, and moved away when Encarnación died in 1850.[xix] Santiago Martinez was the first New
Mexican to settle in the area, his name is the first among “Twelve Heads of
families” listed in the “List of settlers drawn from the Los Angeles Census of
1844 (located at Politanta).”[xx]
COMANDANTE JOSE ANTONIO MARTINEZ
The rather mysterious figure of Comandante Antonio José (not to be confused with Antonio José)
Martinez, “from the town of La Rosa…was also known by that name.”[xxi]
Santa Rosa Plaza was named for St. Rose of Lima, Peru who was the first saint
of the American continent. The
ruins of the Santa Rosa Chapel along NM Highway 84 are still extant. Comandante
José Antonio Martínez and the future priest Antonio José Martínez were both
from the Abiquiu Plaza of “La Rosa,” founded in 1739 a few miles east of
Abiquiú along the Chama River. Either after flooding of the Chama River or
after Indian depredations from the Indian village upon the nearby hill
(Potsiunge), the Santa Rosa community was obliged to move about four miles
upriver to Santo Tomás that became the main church of Abiquiu, and was where
Padre Martinez was baptized.
Comandante Martínez escorted the expedition from the triangular areas of
Taos-Abiquiu-Santa Fe to the rectangular regions of La Puente-Walnut. The Comandante also led his people from
Santa Rosa[xxii] along the
Chama River to the area of San Bernardino-Colton-Riverside along the Santa Ana
River. Comandante José Antonio Martínez made trips back and forth from New
Mexico to California, and eventually began “to organize a colony from his
friends. Don Lorenzo Trujillo was
the first and the one who most helped him.”[xxiii]
At
the beginning of the year 1843, the following persons with all their families
left New Mexico: José Antonio Martínez de la Rosa, Hipólito Espinosa… arrived
in the same year in California at the Lugo ranch, but they quickly saw that the
Lugos would not let go of the land promised to [Santiago] Martínez...The were
prepared to return to New Mexico when Don Juan Bandini offered to donate to
them a strip of land…Immediately they moved down to the land which Bandini had
donated to them.[xxiv]
The name of the “Comandante” is a military title, but at this time, there was
not much of an army in New Mexico that already had been part of the Republic of
Mexico for twenty-two years. Southwest historian David Weber refers
to an adventurer called “Don Antonio José Martinez of Taos—perhaps a relative
of Don Severino’s”[xxv]
who reconnoitered the San Luis and Arkansas valleys of today’s southern
Colorado and was generally active in northern New Mexico and southern Colorado
in 1818 and 1819. Could this be
the same José Antonio Martinez who is now helping to colonize southern
California with New Mexicans, still vigorous but much more experienced after
more than twenty years? The name
is not so uncommon for that time and place, so he may perhaps be an entirely
different man altogether.[xxvi] “Jose Martinez, the comandante, was a leader on the regular caravan to Los Angeles,
so he habitually traveled without a family…[and] was killed by Indians…”[xxvii]
LORENZO TRUJILLO
Lorenzo was a significant figure in the settlement
of almost 150 families from Abiquiu who settled in the Agua Mansa-San Salvador
area during the decade of 1840-1850. He was married to María Dolores Archuleta
Martin, and they had seven children.
His own family, as well as the Rowland-Workman party, was in the fall
1841 caravan that Lorenzo Trujilo led from Abiquiu to Rancho San Bernardino. Lorenzo’s four sons were contracted by
traveler from Tennessee Benjamin Davis Wilson to herd a flock of sheep over the
1200-mile route.[xxviii] This was a principal food source for
the party and for another group that joined up with them on the way to
California. Lorenzo’s sons were Tedoro, Esquipulas, Doroteo, and Julian, and some became Indian
fighters and trekkers like him.
His daughter Matilde married a Sepulveda who owned land in the area of
Pasadena and Altadena[xxix]
where B.D. Wilson later resided and took up the timber industry. For all of Trujillo’s
contributions to the area, including helping to organize regular Catholic
Church services in the area, Lorenzo Trujillo could be considered Founder of
Agua Mansa AKA San Salvador, on the west side of Santa Ana River tributary. Lorenzo’s homestead, AKA Plaza Trujillo, is on the eastside
of that same tributary.
Lorenzo Trujillo was a Genízaro (Hispanicized Indian) orphan, probably of Comanche
origin--a likely victim of children raids between nomadic peoples and Spanish
settlers. Estevan Trujillo and his
wife Juliana Martin-Serrano adopted him, and presented him for baptism at the
church of Santo Tomás on August 12, 1794-- the same church where his fellow
Abiqueño Antonio José Martinez was baptized a year and a half earlier. Lorenzo’s adopting parents were also
his padrinos—not something that
is usual. His stepmother adopting
him was of the large and powerful Martin-Serrano clan of Abiquiu, so well
connected among themselves.
Lorenzo took his surname Trujillo from Juliana’s husband, his stepfather
Estevan.
Lorenzo Trujillo
gained fame as a caravan leader between New Mexico and California. More famous than his earlier treks to
Los Angeles in 1838 when he brought Santiago Martinez as well as his wife and
son to California, were the so-called Rowland-Workman treks of 1841 and
1842. These introduced such an
interesting array of folks from New Mexico to California. The 1841 list included an Episcopal
bishop, an engineer, a Taos trapper originally from Tennessee who would become
Mayor of Los Angeles and have a mountain named after him.[xxx]
For our purposes, however, John
Rowland—for whom Roland Heights is named—was the most interesting of the 1841
trek, and his wife Encarnación Martinez de Rowland was the most interesting of
the 1842 trek.
ENCARNACION MARTINEZ
Encarnación
Martínez of Taos was the most significant person connected to Padre Martinez of
all these New Mexican transplants to southern California. The connection took place in the
marriage between her and John Rowland that Padre Martinez helped to arrange,
and the Letter of Transit that the Padre wrote in 1842, eighteen years after
the marriage between John Rowland and Encarnación Martínez. It is not only possible that the priest
and Rowland’s wife were related—both Martinez people from Taos. However, “it is not known [for sure]
how the priest of Taos was related to Doña María de la Encarnación Martínez de
Rowland.”[xxxi] Her parents were living in Ranchos de
Taos where San Francisco Church is located,[xxxii]
about seven miles south of the Taos Plaza where are located the Church of Our
Lady of Guadalupe and the residence of Padre Martinez.
After his
ordination and before being assigned to his first parish in Tomé, south of
Albuquerque, Padre Martinez lived with his parents in Taos while recuperating
form ill health. Ordained less
than three years, Padre Martinez aided the aged and infirm Franciscan priest of
San Geronimo with Masses and other sacramental functions at the asistencia of Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe in the Taos Plaza
that was not yet a separate parish.
John Rowland had
moved to Taos from Franklin, Missouri in 1823. Padre Martinez helped to arrange the marriage between
Encarnación and John Rowland in 1825. Through the marriage, John Rowland chose
to become a Catholic and become a naturalized Mexican citizen. Both were necessary in order for John
Rowland to have the right to own property[xxxiii]
in either New Mexico or later in California. Encarnación was already a property owner. Roland was a business partner of
William Workman,[xxxiv] and
their endeavors included fur trapping, general merchandise, timber and
whiskey.
When
Texas tried to take over New Mexico in the mid-1830s, Rowland and Workman
declared their sympathy with the Texas cause in spite of their Mexican
citizenship. New Mexico Governor
Armijo denounced them, and they decided to flee to California. In preparation
for his 1841 trip to California, Rowland had asked U.S. Consul Manuel Alvarez,
living in Santa Fe, for a letter of transit for his journey. Alvarez complied, and Rowland made the
trip to California in 1841 with William Workman, but without his wife and
family. Lorenzo Trujillo led
the caravan with a variety of twenty-three American illustrious personages
accompanying. This number does not include some family members, such as those
of William Workman, nor the men from Abiquiu who were hired to herd the
animals. The expedition left New Mexico in September 1841, and arrived at La
Puente Rancho in California on November 5 of the same year.
For
the year 1840-1841, Padre Martinez was on a sabbatical in Durango, and
therefore not available to write a letter of transit for John Rowland’s first
trip to California. Manuel Alvarez
of Santa Fe, Consul for the United States of America, provided John Rowland
such a letter of transit for safe passage that served as a credential and
introduction to three important people who could facility Rowland’s transition.
The letter, dated August 11, 1841,[xxxv]
was addressed to the Governor of Upper California. Upon arrival to California, Rowland first presented the
letter to the officials of Los Angeles and then to Governor Juan B. Alvarado of
California who was living in Monterey.
Finally a long journey of two months, Roland presented his credential to
Padre Tomás Estenaga of San Gabriel Mission. An ample excerpt follows:
I take the liberty of recommending to you Mr. John
Rowland, native of the United States of America, naturalized citizen and
resident of this jurisdiction, since the year 1823, he being an industrious and
peaceful man, very well known and respected in this country, whom I know very
well, having associated with him since the early years of his settling here.
The object of his
journey to our district is, besides that of spreading the use of the goods of
his country, that of seeking if yours, as is rumored, presents greater
advantages than this, so that he may transport himself and his numerous family
to your district.
Whatever favor you
may deem worthy of extending to Mr. Rowland, I shall thank you for, and if ever
you will require my services in this country, you may be sure that I shall have
the greatest pleasure in affording al that may make it pleasant for you.
The
letter of Avarez was useful, but had its limits. More was needed than political
permissions and persuasions. John Rowland in the late fall of 1841 likely
presented his own letter to Governor Alvarado requesting a tract of land “in
the Ex-Mission of San Gabriel a vacant place at La Puente.”[xxxvi]
The Catholic Church was still a very powerful institution in this northern
frontier of the former Spanish Kingdom that was now the independent Republic of
Mexico. The Franciscan priest of
San Gabriel Mission that owned large swaths of land in southern California had
much to say about who might inhabit and come to own property in the area. Although Rowland’s letter was not
addressed to him, the priest was opposed to what it proposed.
Rowland
and Workman traveled to the local political official in Los Angeles, and the
official informed him that lands were to be obtained by the Governor of
California with a recommendation of the Padre in whose area the lands were
sought. Padre Tomás Elenerio de
Estenaga received Rowland courteously, but made no lands available to him or to
William Workman. Their letter from the U.S. Consul in Santa Fe, therefore, was
not sufficient to overcome objections to Rowland and Workman’s becoming
landowners in California.
Although
Governor Juan Batista Alvarado in Monterrey expressed his approval for the La
Puente Land Grant to Rowland,
Father Narcisio Durán--Presidente
of the Missions-- countered in a letter to John Rowland dated January 14,
1842. Durán appealed to an 1835
law of the Mexican Supreme Congress and wrote to the Minister of the Interior
and Public Instruction: “…I solemnly protest in the name of the neophytes of
the Mission of San Gabriel, once, twice, and three times as may be customary by
law, against the sale or alienation of said Rancho of La Puente, as well as
against the transfers of many other pieces of land which this territorial
government has effected with flagrant wrong and prejudice to the poor
neophytes…I declare all such sales or transfers null…particularly not to said
Juan Roldan [sic]…”[xxxvii]
Political
advocates for Rowland included Prefect Santiago Arguello in Los Angeles and
José L. Sepúlveda, Second Justice of the Peace of Los Angeles who wrote on
February 26, 1842 that the applicant has the necessary requisites to be
favored. On the same date, Fr.
Estenaga formalized his objection: “The land of La Puente belongs to this
Community of San Gabriel, which occupies it with more than five hundred head of
large cattle, and in no manner does this community consent that the land should
be alienated since it is the on place which the Mission has for sowing and to
support its cattle.”[xxxviii] Some jockeying among church and state
officials continued, each trying to nullify the actions of the other. On March 9, 1842, Governor Alvarado
issued another communication that the La Puente Land Grant be held “firm and
valid [and] be registered in the proper book”[xxxix]
so long as Rowland build a house on it and inhabit it within a year.
By late-summer
1842, John Rowland returned to Taos to retrieve his wife Encarnación Martinez
and their family in order to settle in east La Puente (present
day-Walnut-Rowland Heights).
Rowland may have been apprehensive of further potential complications
and objections from church people regarding his land grant. Now realizing the
potential importance of a document from a priest to a priest, and wanting to
fortify his documentations, he requested a letter of transit from Padre Antonio
José Martinez with the intention of presenting it to the pastor of San Gabriel
Mission and his superiors.
In
spite of Padre Martinez’ Mexican nationalism and Governor Amijos’s denunciation
of John Rowland for his Texas sympathy against New Mexico, Padre Martinez not
only complied with the request for a letter, but penned a glowing
recommendation. The Padre had
known Rowland the businessman since his arrival in Taos in 1823, and in 1825
had helped the Anglo bridegroom prepare to marry his New Mexican fiancée, his
own relative Encarnación Martinez. Padre Martinez’ letter from Taos dated
September 3, 1842 graciously and effusively, yet precisely, bore witness that
over the past eighteen years, John Rowland was a faithful parishioner of Our
Lady of Guadalupe.[xl]
The Presbyter, Don Antonio José Martínez, pastor of Taos,
Department of New Mexico, hereby certifies, in the most ample form fixed by
law, that Don Juan Rowland, a foreigner from the United States of North
America, married to Doña María de la Encarnación Martinez, a Mexican, and
naturalized in this Republic, and hence a Mexican Citizen like his wife, is a
Catholic as is all his family; that all of this is shown in the parish books of
this parish, of which I am in charge;
that he is accustomed to partake of the Holy Sacrament;
that he contributes to the support of the church; that he faithfully and
religiously obeys the laws and enforces them when holding a position of
authority; and yet with that degree of charity that day by day have been a
greater credit to him; that it is also known to me that in his social life he
is held in the highest esteem as an honored citizen faithful to the state and
to the Government, and respects the laws;
that he is quiet and pacific in all his acts, meeting the
duties and responsibilities that are his; that likewise this is his attitude
toward the church; that he strictly complies with his promises and agreements
when dealing with others; that he is well received by the inhabitants of this
vicinity, and is highly esteemed by the authorities; that he has never been
accused or even suspected of violating the laws for the reason that he never
gave cause therefore; in short, that he has always been a man of fine
deportment, his qualities being as set forth.
This letter of
transit from Padre Martinez helped John Rowland and his family not only settle
into their new homeland of California, but also to prosper. The compatriots of Encarnación Martnez de
Rowland who were living in Politana-Agua Mansa-San Salvador also continued to
prosper. In 1843, in exchange for
protection from marauders, Californian-Mexican Ranchero Don Antonio María Lugo
gave 2,200 acres of his land to the New Mexican settlers who had a reputation
of being experienced Indian fighters.
The 1843 settlers occupied the location just south of Colton on the
northwest side of the Santa Ana River.
By 1844, there were seventy-three New Mexican families living at
Politana. However, within a year, Politanta was abandoned when Juan Bandini
gave the New Mexican colonizers more land at Agua Mansa, and so the two
settlements merged into one.
Between 1844-45, the New Mexican colonists completed a move from
Politana on the Lugo rancho to La Placita de los Trujillos on the Bandini
Donation portion of Rancho Jurupa located on the southeast side of the Santa
Ana River. Homes were built around
a small plaza with an enramada
(brush-covered altar) in the center.
In the fall of 1845, another contingent of colonists arrived from New
Mexico and settled along the northwest bank of the river (south of the Lugo
rancho) at a community called Agua Mansa.
Both communities continued to meet their duty of opposing Indian raiders
and renegade white marauders. The
two settlements were commonly referred to as one: the pueblo of San Salvador. [xli]
The
California-New Mexico connection vigorously continued until the middle of the
nineteenth century. The arrival of
Juan Ignacio Martínez--Encarnación’s brother and John Rowland’s
brother-in-law--at Los Angeles in December 1847 was a token of the continued
development of that connection.
Francisco Estevan Vigil led the New Mexican caravan of two hundred and
twelve travelers including sixty boys on an already well-established trade
route that departed from New Mexico and arrived in California. The caravan of 150 mules, arriving with
New Mexican blankets and other goods, was ready by April 1848 to depart
California with horses and mules for the trip back to New Mexico.[xlii]
Meanwhile, the 1848 California Gold Rush began to deplete the southern
California New Mexican colony as several young men tried out their luck at
striking it rich in northern California--but to no avail.
John
Rowland eventually gained clear title to his land, the first land grant given
to an American in California.[xliii]
William Workman was to share title, dividing the land grant into east and west
La Puente.[xliv] Padre Martinez with his letter of
transit on behalf of Rowland was definitely instrumental in the land development
of southern California. Both John Rowland and William Workman took possession
of the land, and built their homes not far from each other--Workman on Julian
Road off Hacienda Blvd. in what is now the City of Industry, and Rowland in
nearby Rowland Heights.[xlv] The La Puente Rancho that they divided
between themselves has been further sub-divided into a myriad of independent
southern California communities from Monrovia to Whittier.
The
New Mexico colonization had peaked.
Enlisted as an instrument of manifest destiny during the U.S.-Mexican
War, the Mormon Battalion was born. Brigham Young wanted to colonize the
Pacific Coast, and favored purchase of the Chino Rancho. In 1851, almost on cue at the very middle
of the nineteenth century, the Mormons came into San Bernardino as a new wave
of immigrants, bringing their own style and heritage. Emigrants left Salt Lake for California on March 14, 1851,
and arrived at Cajon pass on June 11.
Within a short time, almost a thousand Mormons arrived, and by the fall,
they had purchased the Rancho San Bernardino from the Lugo family on credit for
$77,550.[xlvi] The purchase included 75 head of cattle
for food and eight leagues of land where they would grow wheat on land where
formerly sheep and cattle grazed. In their common attempt to avoid a spurt of
Indian depredations, Mormons and Agua Mansa settlers lived together for a brief
time during 1852 in the High Lands of San Bernardino. By 1853, the Mormons themselves had scattered, and a new
immigration era had begun.
Encarnación
Martinez de Rowland died towards on November 21, 1851—after twenty-six years of
marriage to John Rowland and the birth of ten children. Soon after her death,
Santiago Martinez moved back to Taos where his son Daniel was born. Four of the Rowland children, ranging
in age from 8 to 19, remained in John’s care. Charlotte Grey, a young widow, was among the first American
settlers that came from back east to the San Gabriel Valley in that year. She lived in a squatters’ village in
the area of El Monte, and one day traveled to John Rowland’s portion of Rancho
de La Puente to buy fruits and vegetables.[xlvii] In the summer of 1852, romance bloomed
and John and Charlotte got married in the fall of 1852, a year after the death
of his New Mexican wife. Encarnación
was buried in the private cemetery at the Workman hacienda on Julian Rd. (named for William) off Hacienda
Boulevard near Hacienda Heights in the City of Industry that is adjacent to La
Puente. That is the finally
resting place for so many women from Taos, New Mexico. An era had come to a close, and--with
the marriage of John Rowland to Charlotte Gray--a new era began.
APPENDIX:
EARLIER EXPLORATIONS AND NM-CA EXPEDITIONS
Antecedents of
that pattern of migration from Baja California or New Mexico to California go
back before the founding of the United States. In 1765, a Ute Indian sold an ingot of silver to a
blacksmith in Abiquiu, the small village northeast of Santa Fe that was to play
such an important part in the New Mexico-California connection. This led Juan Maria Antonio Rivera to
take some Spaniards to explore western Colorado that at the time was part of
New Mexico, but they soon returned to Santa Fe without discovery of the precious
metal. Governor Tomás Velez de Cachupín instructed Rivera to return and explore
the region once again—this time not for precious metal, but to reconiter the
area for the possible presence of other Europeans. He found none, and again returned home after leaving a large
inscribed cross near what became Moab, Utah.
In 1769, the year
San Diego Mission was founded, Gaspar de Portolá with an expedition that
included Franciscan clergy, made his way from Baja California north to
Monterey. One of the stops was
near today’s entrance into Elysian Park along North Broadway in Los Angeles
where a river flowed from the area of San Fernando to the San Pedro
Harbor. The date was August 2, the
Franciscan feast of the “Porciúncula,”
named for the small chapel in Assisi where St. Francis used to like to
pray. His transitus (death) in the thirteenth century took place in that
former Benedictine oratory, and his followers in the sixteenth century built a
large Basilica around that oratorio, dedicating it to Nuestra Señora
Reina de Los Angeles, Our Lady Queen of
Angels. Fray Juan Crespi of the
Portolá expedition made an entry into his diary on August 2, 1769, and called
the river Río Porciúncula in
honor of that Franciscan feast.
The “L.A. River,” twelve miles west of San Gabriel, received its name
twelve years before the City of Los Angeles was founded in 1781 as an asistencia of the San Gabriel Mission. This mother mission of Los Angeles,
founded in 1771 two years after San Diego Mission, was the fourth in the chain
of twenty-one missions of Alta California, most of them by the sainted Junípero
Serra.
In 1774, Captain
Juan Bautista De Anza led his first military expedition from Tubac, Mexico to
Mission San Gabriel de Arcangel.
It was the first overland route to safely supply the mission outposts in
Alta California. Friar Francisco
Garces accompanied the expedition that traversed the desert to the base of the
San Jacinto Mountains and emerged on the other side. The expedition turned north, and forded the Santa Ana River
at Riverside where Father Garces celebrated the first Mass in the region on the
first day of spring—March 21, 1774.
[Cf. John DeGano, Archivist for the Diocese of San Bernardino, “History
of the People of the Diocese of San Bernardino,” in 2003 Diocesan Directory, p.
5.] Exactly two years later, in
early 1776, Father Garces again came into the area—this time from a northern
route-- and recorded his sighting of the San Bernardino Valley then called the
San Jose Valley. Fray Garces
successfully traveled from Mission San Gabriel through the California Gulf to
Hopi villages in Arizona, and his journey opened the road from west to east.
Mexican Friar
Anastacio Dominguez was appointed in 1775 as canonical visitor to the missions
of New Mexico. His task was to
evaluate the clergy and inspect the condition of the archives in Santa Fe,
mostly destroyed in the 1680 Indian uprising. [Thomas G. Alexander in Web <Utah History to Go>.] Spanish-born Fray Silvestre Velez
de Escalante who had worked at Zuni Pueblo was already in Santa Fe. NM Governor
Fermin de Mendinueta encouraged both of them to explore territories to the west
to find out if any other Europeans were there. They began a journey toward the Pacific on July 4, 1776, but
a Comanche attack gave them second thoughts. Just as Friars Dominguez and Escalante were about to
scuttle their plan to transverse an overland route to Monterey in Alta
California, they learned of Fray Garces’ successful trek, and this spurred them
on. With the full support of
Governor Mendinueta, they recruited help from El Paso, southern Colrado and
Utah. With further help of
Genízaro guides from Abiquiu and the Indian boy Joaquin from Laguna, they again
took up their expedition from New Mexico to California. Bernardo Miera y
Pacheco, a retired military officer living in Santa Fe, served as map-maker
marking the latitudes of their travels and suggesting future presidio
locations. However, because of a
snowstorm in the Grand Canyon, the explorers were forced to cross the Colorado
River by Lake Powell’s Padre Bay.
After traveling over 1700 miles, they returned to Santa Fe on January 2,
1777. Nevertheless, they did
become the first white men to explore the magnificent Arizona canyon.
After
Mexican independence from Spain in 1821, trade between the United States and
New Mexico--now no longer part of the Kingdom of Spain, but belonging to the
Republic of Mexico--freely flowed between St. Louis and Santa Fe. Trails are customarily initiated by
prehistoric animals and then traversed by ancient hunters and gatherers. They are later tamed by people
interested in trade routes for missionary and/or military use as well as for
commercial purposes. EL CAMINO
REAL was the roadway through Mexico-Durango-Chihuahua-Santa Fe (including
Abiquiu-Taos) that was used to transport church, military, and household goods
to and from its various points. When this camino extended into California, it morphed into what John C. Fremont called
the “Spanish Trail.”
Capitan
José Romero, born near San Francisco, was a cavalry captain in command of the Presidio of Tucson. He followed
his own route making three journeys from Arisze in the Sonora Desert and Tucson
to San Gabriel Alta California from 1823 to 1826, and is considered one of the first white men to explore the
desert area of the Agua Caliente tribe, present day Palm Springs. Not too much
is known about his personal life or background, but his travels are well
chronicled in his dairies. [Cf. Romero
Expeditions-Dairies and Accounts: 1823-1826, edited by Lowell John Bean and
Wiliam Marvin Mason, Palm Springs Desert Museum, c. 1962, pp. 117.]
When
emperor Iurbide assumed political control in Mexico, he sent Rev. Agustín
Fernandez de San Vicente, a canon of Durango, to inspect California in order to
ascertain the extent of foreign activities in California as well as the loyalty
of the Californians. By 1822,
Russians had a presence in Fort Ross, and Mexico had great interest to open up
an inland route from California to Sonora. San Bernardino was recognized as a point of departure for
such a route to Tucson, and it was also on the route from San Gabriel to the
Colorado River. Besides opening up
commerce, the route would also open up the possibilities for
evangelization. Emperor Iturbide’s
Minister of Relations through Governor Sola requested Captain Jose Romero to
invent a mail route between the points, and to take a party of sixty to map it
by way of the lower Colorado River.
Romero began the tasks in September 1822, and continued until 1826. Jedediah Smith, a tall mountain man
over six feet, trekker and author of Commerce of the Prairies, he traversed the southwest. In his travels, he connected many
regions including Taos and Mission San Gabriel where, by his own testimony, the
Padres twice receive him well in 1826 and again in 1827. He died young at the age of 32 after an
altercation , it is said,with Comanches.
[i] Cf., John De Gano, Diocesn Archivist, “History of the People of the Diocese of San Bernardino,” 2003 Diocesan Directory, 25th Anniversary Edition, p. 5.
Captain Juan Bautista De Anza led a military expedition from Tubac, Mexico to Mission San Gabriel de Arcangel in 1774. The purpose was to open up an overland route to supply missionary outposts in Alta California. (Franciscans from New Mexico had been trying to do the same thing, but got only as far as Arizona.) At Riverside, De Anza forded the Santa Ana River, and Father Garces celebrated the first Mass on the first day of spring. Exactly two years after his first encounter with the region, De Anza again came through San Bernardino—this time coming from the north.
--
In 1842, Governor José Figueroa secudlarized the missions, and in that same year, a contingent from Abiquiu, New Mexico settled along the Santa Ana River near present day Colton.
[ii] Although the place in Elysian Park is much better known as Chavez Ravine, named for Julian Chavez of Abiquiu, some residents of the hilly area have prefered to call it Palo Verde for the name given it in a 1912 map of residential tract #12. Tom Marmolejo, a native of Palo Verde, has written his memories of his boyhood neighborhood, and objects to the identification of his home territory with the name of Chavez Ravine that he does not consider part of his territory of “Tract 12.”
[iii] Soon after Hipolito Espinosa and his family joined them, their place became known as “Politana”—located on “Bunker Hill” across from the present-day location of San Bernardino College near the City of Colton and the intersection of the 10 and 210 Freeways.
[iv] Rowland, Donald E., John Rowland and William Workman: Southern California Pioneers of 1841, Historical Society of Southern California, 200 E. Ave. 43, L.A. 90031. [(323) 222-0546; Don (& Jean) Rowland - Camarillo, CA 93010 (805) 482-8129, p. 20. Don Rowland mentions that Encarnación’s father Felipe Martinez had a business relationship with John Rowland, and may have been the one who introduced the couple to each other.
[v] Ibid. p. 74.
[vi] Ibid., p. 27. José Sepuveda sold six horses to Encarnación and her mother Ana María (Trujillo), and the bill of sale was sent from La Puente, CA to Ranchos de Taos.
[vii]Another young man of altar server age, also living in Abiquiu at the time, was Miguel Gallegos who later went to the Padre’s elementary school in Taos, then to his minor seminary, studied in Durango and became a priest. Later, Gallegos served as New Mexico’s first congressman.
[viii]His brother Lt. José María Chavez went continued with trips between New Mexico and California. Lt. José María Chavez went to jail the following year for his part in the Battle of San Buenaventura, California. After serving a short prison sentence, José returned to New Mexico to continue trading within the Ute territory into the 1850s.
[ix] Online Document: “County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors: Julian Chavez – 1852, 1858, 1861.”
[x] Bruce Harley, Ph. D., “CHRONOLOGY: The Founding of Agua Mansa – First Settlement East of Mission San Gabriel,” Nuestras Raíces – Winter 2002, Vol. 14, No. 4, Genealogical Society of Hispanic America, pp. 144, 147.
[xi] Spanish Trail Website: “Expedition Chronology between NM and CA. The site features names and dates and events that consist of several persons making many exchanges of California horses and mules (some allegedly by theft) for New Mexico blankets and “serapes.”
[xii] Lorenzo Trujillo had originally named this place Archuleta Springs in honor of his own wife Dolores Archuleta.
[xiii] Harley, Archivist, Diocese of San Bernardino, The Story of Agua Mansa: Its Settlement, Churches and People—First Community in San Bernardino Valley, 1842-1893, Diocese of San Bernardino Archives, 1998, pp. 111, p. 12.
[xiv] Harley, From New Mexico to California: San Bernardino Valley’s First Settlers at Agua Mansa, San Bernardino County Museum Association Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 3,4 - 2000; 2024 Orange Tree Lane, Redlands, CA 92374-4560, p.5. This place was located on Bunker Hill by the Santa Ana River at the juncture of the 215 and 15 Freeways. The property included what is today the Greek Orthodox of St. Elias the Prophet.
[xv] Harley, compiler and Archivist, Diocese of San Bernardino, “Mission San Gabriel Expands Eastward, 1819-1834, ” Readings in Diocesan Heritage – Vol. II, August 1989, p. 7. This was the supposed location of a prior Indian settlement that Padre Dumetz—one of the very last friars who had walked with Padre Junípero Serra—had visited. Spanish priest Father Juan Cabarellía claimed that Padre Dumetz celebrated Mass there on the feast of St. Bernardine on May 20, 1810, and for that reason this area was called San Bernardino. However, historian Bruce Harley, historian and former archivist for the Diocese of San Bernardino vigorously disputed that theory, although historian George W. Beattie gives it credence.
[xvi] Cf. Harley, opera omnia, passim.
[xvii]So many northern New Mexicans settled in historic area of Agua Mansa-San Salvador in the middle of the nineteenth century. It is south of the town of Colton, along the 10 Interstate Freeway between Rancho Ave. exit and the 215 Freeway that follows the Santa Ana River. It is just behind (to the south of) a very visible landmark: the lone cement hill, Stover Mountain, named for Isaac Stover, a Taos trapper who came to Los Angeles in 1837, and later settled in the Agua Mansa area. At an advanced age, Stover was killed by a bear in the San Bernardino mountains. Since the Word War I, the hill has been topped with an American flag that can easily be seen.
[xviii] Rowland, op. cit., p. 74. Underscore – my emphasis.
[xix] Interview with June Wentworth member of City of Walnut Planning Commission, in August of 2002 [(909) 595-4706]. She informed me that 1) Santiago was the name of resident of the (now razed) Martinez Adobe in Walnut; 2) that he was a relative of Encarnación Martinez; and 3) that Encarnación employed him, and invited him to come and live nearby. She also confirmed that the site of the (Santiago) Martinez Adobe used to be on property of Vejar School located in that part of La Puente that later became the city of Walnut. It is near the original Walnut City Hall at the intersection of Lemon Ave. and Valley Blvd., twenty-six miles to the east of central city Los Angeles. In the early 1960s, it was razed to make room for Vejar Elementary School at 20222 W. Vejar Rd. in Walnut, CA 91789 [(909) 595-1261]. Ray Mc Mullen of Human Resources of Walnut School District, [(909) 595-1261], informed me that farmer Randy Bennet had painted an amateur picture of that [Santiago Martinez] adobe upon a hill. School secretary Yadira [(909) 594-1434] was well disposed to find out if the painting of the Martinez Adobe was still around.
[xx] Joyce Carter Vickery, Defending Eden, Department of History, University of California, Riverside, and the Riverside Museum Press; Riverside, California, 1977, total pp. 130; p. 120.
From Beattie and Beattie, Heritage of the Valley, p. 60. Other names include Feliciana Valdez “(widow of Apolio (sic) Espinosa),” Lorenzo Trujillo, and Luis Slover (Isaac Slover) for whom the lone cement mountain off Hwy 10 and Rancho Rd. just south of Colton is named. The Agua Mansa-San Salvador settlement is just behind that landmark.
[xxi] Carter Vickery, op. cit., Re: “La Rosa”- pp.116 (Spanish) and118 (English).
[xxii] The original Spanish settlement of Abiquiu established1739-1740.
[xxiii] Ibid., p. 118 where author records an oral tradition of “‘La Placita Story’ from the Patterson file) as told to Miguel Alvarado by an original pioneer, propably (sic) a Martínez….As can be seen there are several discrepancies in this version that can be attribute to confused memories as well as family loyalty.”-- Joyce Carter Vickery
[xxiv] Ibid.
[xxv] David Weber, On the Edge of the Empire: The Taos Hacienda of los Martínez, Museum of New Mexico Press, Santa Fe, c. 1996, pp. 120, p. 44. Weber cites as his source A. B. Tomas, “Documents…Northern Frontier, 1818-1819,” in New Mexico Historical Review for April 1929: pp. 152, 158 and 159.
[xxvi] The maternal grandfather of my maternal grandfather was also named José Antonio Martinez. Ricardo Garcia, my maternal grandfather, was born in 1881 at Arroyo Hondo, twelve miles north of Taos. It was settled in 1804 by uncles of Padre Martinez at the same time that Severino Martinez, the Padre’s father, was establishing his homestead in Taos. The timing works out so that he could have been one or the other José Antonio Martínez—the Colorado adventurer of 1819, or the experienced comandante who helped settle Agua Mansa, but never resided there. ¡Sabrá Dios!
Ricardo’s wife, my maternal grandmother whom we called Titia, was Gaudalupe Gonzales, and her mother was also a Martínez. By family lore, we have some Padre Martinez connection through my mother’s side of the family.
[xxvii] Harley, compiler, “The Agua Mansa Story: A collection of papers compiled on the occasion of the 150th Anniversary of the settlement of Agua Mansa,” San Bernrdino County Museum Association QUARTERLY, Vol. 31 (1), Winter 1991, p. 19.
[xxviii] Harley, CHRONOLOGY, op. cit., p. 145.
[xxix] However, upon the untimely death of her elderly husband, his lands had already been distributed to other members of the family, and Matilde received no inheritance. However, she later married again to a landed person, and inherited his land.
[xxx] Carter Vickery, op. cit., pp. 119-120. Lorenzo Trujillo was wagon master for the trek, and its real leader. Episcopal Bishop James D. Mead was listed as a physician in the manifest of twenty-six persons and things that John Rowland presented to Justice of the Peace Jose Dominguez in Los Angeles upon the groups arrival on November 5, 1841. Only William Workman and another brought their families on this trip. John Rowland would return to NM to bring back his family the following year.
Benjamin Davis Wilson of Tennessee was a fur trapper in NM who in 1841 settled in Agua Mansa and married into the Californio Yorba family. He purchased from Bandini half of his land, then moved to Pasadena, and became Mayor of Los Angeles in 1851. Mt. Wilson was named after him. Isaac Givens was an engineer who kept a journ of the trek (at UC Berkeley), and made a map of the La Puente land that was a cattle station for the San Gabriel Mission. It later became the Roland-Workman land grant, stretching east to west from the City of Industry and Hacienda Heights to Roland Heights-Walnut.
[xxxi] Rowland, op. cit., p. 74.
[xxxii] Rowland, op. cit., p. 27 refers to a bill of sale dated April 25, 1834 for six white horses that took place at La Puente, California—a championship horse-cattle ranch and grounds for San Gabriel Mission. Ignacio Martinez bought the horses from José Sepulveda for Encanación Martinez and for Rafael Martinez, and addressed the bill of sale in care of Encarnación’s mother Ana María Trujillo at Ranchos.
[xxxiii] In an effort to populate the territory, the Mexican Congress passed a law on August 18, 1824 that eleven square leagues of land were to be given to any good [Mexican] citizen or any foreigner who accepted Mexican citizenship and the Catholic faith (religion). One league is equivalent to 4,438 acres.
[xxxiv] John Rowland and William Workman became successful merchants in Taos. He a general merchandise store specializing in furs and pelts. They personally trapped them or more often bought from the Indians or French Canadian trappers or Yankee mountain men. However, already by 1826, the beaver fur trade was already beginning to fade as beaver hats were becoming less fashionable in Europe. Rowland began to look at other interests in California, such as otter fur, and also began to diversify his business operations in Taos. He operated a flourmill, cut lumber, and made a local brew of whiskey. The distillery or Viñatera was about three miles up the little Rio Grande Canyon, and was in the care of Pedro Antonio Gallegos. Northern neighbor and fellow entrepreneur Simon Turley also operated a multipurpose timber mill. He would later perfect the brew as "Taos Lightning" and sell it to thirsty trappers, mountain men, Pueblo Indians, or descendents of the Spanish settlers of the area.
[xxxv] Letter of Credential for John Rowland from Consul Manuel Alvarez of Santa Fe, addressed to the Governor of Upper California, and dated August 11, 1841, quoted in Donald E. Rowland, op cit., pp. 61-62.
[xxxvi] Ibid., p. 63.
[xxxvii] Ibid., p. 69.
[xxxviii] Ibid., p. 65.
[xxxix] Ibid., p. 66.
[xl] Ibid., p. 73. Quoted from Mrs. Lillian Dibble, granddaughter of John Rowland who owned the original letter written in Spanish that was first privately printed in Romance of La Puente, pp. 13-14. James M. Sheridan, Attorney and Counselor at law made first translation into English.
[xli] Cf. Harley, Opera Citata, passim.
[xlii] Spanish Trail Assocition, op cit.
[xliii] When Pio Pico succeeded as the last Mexican Governor of California, John Rowland and William Workman on June 22, 1845 confirmed their land grants that they had possessed for three years. After the American occupation of California in 1846, a question about legitimate ownership was raised. The American government wanted to lay claim to ownership of the land, but on October 3, 1852, Rowland and Workman filed a petition to the U.S. Land Commission. Two years later, on April 14, 1854, the Land Commission allowed the claim to stand. The U.S. Supreme Court ratified that decision, giving patent rights to the Rancho La Puente on April 19, 1857.
[xliv] The John Rowland homestead was in Rowland Heights, and the William Workman homestead was in today’s city of Industry. A non-exlusive list of the communities that today make up this area of the La Puente land grant includes what are now the areas of Monrovia, Covina, West Covina, Temple City, Walnut, Rowland Heights, La Puente, Valinda, La Puente, City of Industry Hacienda Heights, and Whittier.
[xlv] Address of original John Rowland homestead: 18800 E. Railroad – Roland Heights, CA 91748.
[xlvi] Cf. <californiageneaology.org/sanbernardino/mormons>
[xlvii] Rowland, op. cit., p. 130.
